Today is MLK in the US and we went out to meet friends for brunch. One of the topics we talked about was space travel and how this is could shorten our time spent on planes.
While tech is not quite there, there have been promising advancements by SpaceX, Blue Origin and Virgin Galactic. These private sector initiatives give me hope that we might achieve low-orbit fast travel by 2100.
I spent 5 days on planes, traveled 53,000 mi on 28 flights in 2019, per my AppInTheAir profile.
I can’t but wonder how much time and jet fuel I could have saved if we had something like this available:
Now to explain this diagram:
Science: The concept of the Regional Space Hub relies on the ESA definition of low-Earth orbiting space craft. It assumes that once orbiting altitude is achieved, and the space hub is running at full speed, the point-to-point travel is a matter of finding the docking timings to make the journey most efficient
Technical Prerequisites: The three companies I mentioned and a few government programs are hard at work to make scalable, reusable rockets that can get people off the ground and land back safely to refuel and go back up again. DARPA is already working on a Transportation Hub concept, fully run by robots, so that might be a good blueprint for the Regional Space Hubs
The journey: I want to visit my parents in Romania. For simplicity, I asked them to meet me in Bucharest, the capital city of Romania. I’m leaving from San Francisco. Currently, I have to use min 2 planes and travel for over 15 hours to get to Bucharest using traditional jets. In the future, I want to get on a rocket at SFO (15-20 minutes with take-off procedures), get to the nearest Regional Space Hub, rely on the orbit speed to get me over Eastern Europe (minutes to switch ships, or stay on the same ship and get new passengers for those with different destinations), where the Romania-bound return rocket would shuttle me down to the Otopeni Airport (10-15 minutes). The whole journey could take me anywhere between 40 minutes and 2 hours, depending if I have to circle the Earth in the Hub waiting for the downstream shuttle.
Bonus, this would be more environmentally friendly than traditional airplanes, if NASA’s new fuel research program succeeds in producing better rocket fuel.
Per NASA, “It takes the shuttle approximately 8-1/2 minutes to get to orbit. And if you think about it, we’re accelerating a 4-1/2 million pound system from zero miles per hour to its orbital velocity of 17,500 miles per hour in those 8-1/2 minutes. So it’s a heck of a ride for the astronauts. They typically experience about three times the force of gravity during most of the ascent, and once we reach orbit, when the main engines cut off, they go from that three-G acceleration to zero acceleration virtually instantaneously, and that’s when they become weightless on orbit.”
If you would have talked to someone in 1920 about an average person traveling over 53,000 mi in one year for business and pleasure, they would have called you crazy. Let’s see what happens by 2100. I plan to be alive to try it out, once it becomes commercially viable.
Everyone writes about guides and success stories. Those are easy, and they lend you their positive aura. It’s not just in marketing, it’s in every profession, even more so if you’re an entrepreneur. While fail groups and stories emerge every now and then, it’s the success that shines over and tries to give people an example to follow.
I, for one, believe in the power of mistakes and fails, if taken in correctly and constructively. They teach you what doesn’t work so you can focus on what does work. This is valid for anything you do in life.
I started my marketing career by focusing on wins and on the fails of others. Now it’s time to show some of my own mistakes and learnings.
This is an easy one. I didn’t always listen to my peers. I didn’t listen to my target audience, nor my teams all the time. As a result, I had to redo work, adapt campaigns that fell flat and do post-mortems on unsalvageable work.
Assuming I always know best
This one is especially true as you get some wins under your belt, and it’s connected to the listening that I talked about before. Do research, test your campaigns and learn from smaller batches before you launch to full lists of people/with huge budgets. If you ask the right questions, you’ll get guidance from the ones you want to steer towards your goal.
Rushing things out the door
This is a classic. We need everything done yesterday. Marketing has infinite amount of work. Let’s try to get as much as we can out the door as fast as possible. That never leads to anything good. I did that early on in my career and still catch myself wanting to do this even now. Stop, focus, prioritize and do less with more intent, more analysis and more resources.
Choosing an angle that’s too extreme
In a world that’s more and more polarized, it’s easy to fall into the extreme bandwagon. Either too conservative, or too progressive, too radical, or too tame, campaigns and directions that try too hard to be in one camp will eventually cause the other to reject you completely. The risk is huge, because if you are wrong, it’s hard to go back from an extreme claim. Don’t be extreme, you’ll thank me later. But also try to be a little bit bold, so you don’t fall flat.
Not empathizing with the person challenging me
I used to always start a thought process with thinking about “what would I do”. That put me in challenging positions when anther other person’s context was very different from mine, and that led to conflict. Nowadays, I’m trying to think like I were in their shoes – what background they have, how they would interpret things through their cultural and personal lens. Doesn’t always work, but I’m more mindful of it and life had been better as a result.
Being too confrontational about things
This is a tricky one, since some cultures interpret assertiveness as a sign of confidence, others see it as aggressive. It’s pretty similar to the empathy point I made earlier. Think about what people around you do often to get their points across successfully and replicate that. Don’t hold on to your assertive nature if it gets you nowhere. Took me a few years of US to learn that.
Not waiting for math and statistics to confirm my findings
This is another way of saying: Stop jumping to conclusions and wait for all the data to come in. Sometimes, statistics can be skewed the wrong way if not all your audience is correctly represented. Also connected to rushing things out the door. Good things come to those who wait on the math and stats to confirm their findings.
This is a personal one more than a business one, but hey, guilty. Less now, more early in my career, but this blog bears witness that I write in bursts – 3-4-5 articles, then silence. Get better at being consistent and you’ll get farther than people like me.
Always trying to respond
I’ll just say here that silence is sometimes the best answer, especially for social media. Don’t feed the trolls. Don’t humor the hecklers. Anything you say can and will be used against you online. Now I hope that made you stop and think for a bit. It helped me a lot.
Taking things too personally
This is my parting thought — don’t fall in love with your campaigns or messages, because when you put them to the test, they might fail. And if you love them, you might not see that right away and might not learn from that mistake/miss, and end up wasting time, money and resources. The job well done is worth falling in love with after it produced the desired outcome, and then some.
I’ve been in San Francisco for over 3 and a half years, but I’ve moved around a lot in the past 10ish years. At some point, I decided to document that journey and show the good and not so good parts of moving around.
Ok, so I wrote about the great year we had and it got me thinking. Why not go all the way back in time and document the entire Romania IT in San Francisco history. It’s only been 3 years or so since it started, so it should be pretty easy.
Also, there’s power in retrospectives and I’ll write about that in a separate blog post.
Some background: I arrived in San Francisco in July 2016, took a few months to get a job, adjust and meet people before I got involved with the Romanian IT movement. Before that I ran the Romanian Entrepreneurs in UK group in London for about 2 years with Razvan and Mircea, but that’s a story for another post, too. I was also very focused on numbers and attendee counts at the beginning, and felt pressure to deliver. I don’t anymore and it’s become second nature. Funny to think about how, when I was a kid in 2nd grade (i think), I tried to organize my birthday party and no one showed up because I was too afraid to invite them, and now I’ve been organizing community events for a little more than 6 years.
Enough backstories, here it goes.
July 2016 – December 2016
I wrote my first official blog post in December 2016, as part of the greater Romanian IT community. We were planning to launch in multiple cities in Europe and US, and San Francisco was one of them. I was fresh off the plane and full of energy to start building the community here.
I also hosted the first AI & ML webinar, a 101 session with Ruben and Cosmin, We talked about my work at DigitalGenius, Ruben’s Microsoft experience and Cosmin’s ML engineering knowledge at Clusterr.io. I predicted AI would take off in 2017 and wrote a takeaways blog here pointing to the Medium post linked above. This was our first event in the Facebook group, too.
We met for the first time, at Natoma Cabana, with a very interesting, official crowd, more details in the dedicated blog post. Back then, we thought that this would be the format, some speaking/intros and then networking. It was also the first event Mihai and I organized together. See my official attire 🙂
During February, we promoted a Startup feedback session for CoinFlux and another Romanian IT webinar, this time about network security. We also promoted a Repatriot dinner in San Francisco, and a Romanian entrepreneurs and investors tour of Silicon Valley, both organized by Dea Wilson.
Nothing happened in March 2019, I was traveling a lot for work and didn’t get to organize an event until April. We promoted a few Romanian startup exits and recommender systems webinar.
It was time for the second meetup for Romanian IT in San Francisco, and we chose another downtown location for our get-together – Thirsty Bear. It was a pretty good turnout and people said that this format would work better for them. I was also fundraising for Hospice of Hope’s Copaceni Tech House, as I was preparing for my marathon run in LA later in the year.
We continued to promote the webinar on recommender systems and a Romanian Investors from Fribourg Capital, Liberty Technology Park and the Principals of KPMG meetup organized by George Roth and his RABN group.
Thanks to Liana from Memo.ai, community members got discounted access to SuperBot 2017, an AI conference in San Francisco.
May – December 2017
In May, we only promoted one Startup feedback session, with Anda, a friend of mine, and her company, Colorimetrix. We also started promoting Spherik’s mentorship program, which I eventually ended up taking part in.
In June, we promoted an Ethereum Deep Dive in Berkeley, two Startup feedback sessions, one with Planable, run by Xenia, another friend, where I was a panelist, and another one with Baro.io.
In July, we met at another RABN meetup, at the JW Marriott in San Francisco, and in August we helped Repatriot promote their survey about Romanians abroad.
In October, we met again in San Francisco, at Thirsty Bear. Great turnout, no pics this time. We also promoted the Repatriot Summit, that took place in Romania, that October.
Towards the end of 2017, as crypto was taking off, I discovered El Rio, the place that was soon to be our home for the next few years. A few Romanians got together there, too, for a Bitcoin meetup, and that’s where Mihai and I got the idea to move our meetups to El Rio.
January – February 2018
It took another Thirsty Bear meetup in February to get us to move to El Rio in March. No pics this time, either, but we had a theme again – Blockchain and AI, two of the hottest topics that year. We also promoted a $200 discount that Dea was offering to our community for the StartupGrind conference.
March was a pretty busy month, and we met up again, this time at El Rio. We realized that people didn’t want topics or too much of a structure for these meetups, so we ditched that part and evolved into what the group is today. Took us longer that I want to admit, but hey, we got there.
We also promoted a Romanian IT survey this month and Diaspora Invest, an event for people who wanted to return to Romania after living in San Francisco for a while.
April – June 2018
In April, we focused on promoting the Romanian IT global mentorship program, at its second edition. In May, we promoted the RABN get-together at their annual picnic in the South Bay. We also helped Code for Romania organize their event in June.
July – August 2018
That summer we got involved in an anti graft campaign in Romania, helped promote their signature gathering campaign. We also started recruiting for the 3rd mentorship program through Romanian IT. This is when we held our summer mixer at El Rio, great turnout for July.
September – October 2018
We had our Autumn mixer in September, I was still thinking about the right cadence for these meetups to get maximum attendance. After a great meetup in September, we hiked to Alamere Falls that October, albeit we had quite the drought and didn’t see much water. It was fun nevertheless.
October is summer in SF, so we tried a new venue, Zeitgeist, in one of the sunny Fridays. It was fun, but not for casual chats. We kept El Rio as our primary venue.
We also started promoting Code for Kids in October, for their November event in San Francisco.
In November, we helped promote the Code for Kids in San Francisco event, where a few of us showed up to find out what they have been working on. Impressive stuff. In Berkeley, there were more Romanian films being screened, so we helped people learn more about those, too.
We did one more hike before the rainy season – this time in Purisima Creek. Great turnout, 7.6mi range. Last but not least, we organized a little Cards Against Humanity game at my place mid month. Lots of fun!
We ended the year with a Romania 100 year old celebration and later that month the final official meetup at El Rio.
Overall, we did 22 events, both virtual and in-person. Lots of people, lots of learning, and lots of gratitude for everyone who is part of our community.
Later edit: Thanks Andrei for the extra info I missed!
After I set up the Mailchimp list earlier this month, time to complete 2/2 of my Romanian IT in San Francisco bucket list for this year. It’s been a great 2019 and I think it’s worth going through it month by month and seeing what happened in the local community, our events, hikes and announcements, and how the group has grown to 454 members to date.
It was a quiet month, with no official events. We helped the Cassiopeia – Zero Robotics high school team connect with a few Romanians in the Bay Area, as they were visiting the US for a robotics competition. We also announced our first meetup of the year, and a visit from one of the Romanian IT founders.
Oana, and the Find My Mentor team, kick-started the 3rd (or 4th?) edition of their program in mid-January. Find My Mentor is a 3-month mentorship program, designed to connect entrepreneurs and tech professionals with mentors, in order to accelerate their personal and professional growth. It featured 30 mentors, and more than 360 mentorship sessions, in over 20 countries. We had several mentors that participated from the Bay Area, including me and Andrei.
We had our 1st meetup of the year, thanks for those who showed up. We had a few people traveling in the Bay Area and we were happy to host them at our usual venue, in the Mission District.
Later that month, a few members decided to celebrate Valentine’s day together in San Francisco, at the Emporium SF – no pics.
UiPath also hosted their first meetup in the Bay Area, in Mountain View, which we helped promote via the group. There were three more events we announced in February – Google’s Cloud conference in April (we got free tickets for the community, thanks Victor), a South Bay Romanian IT meetup organized by Ionut and Adrian, and the European Chamber of Commerce May 9 cruise to celebrate Europe day.
Last but not least, Oana, one of the Romanian IT co-founders, decided we should expand to be Romanian IT in USA. Let’s just say the local community wasn’t very happy about the change, but we had to live with it for 30 days, due to Facebook Groups rules
This month, we held the first San Jose meetup at the Three Sisters bar (in San Pedro Square Market) and it had a pretty good turnout. We announced our April meetup for San Francisco. I was away in Utah for a few weeks, so things had to be scheduled around that.
We also promoted
The Swedish-American Chamber of Commerce 2019 Spring European Pitch Night, where Romania was to have one startup. I’m not sure if anyone from our community attended.
May was all about hiking and elections. We went to Berry Creek Falls (12mi), Stinson Beach/Cataract Falls (~8mi) and we also got together to vote and catch up afterwards in the East Bay.
This month, a lot of the focus was on elections, volunteers and the Code For Romania hack day that was to be held on June 1st.
We started off the month with pics and videos from the hack day. I couldn’t make it, but a few of members did. We also connected with RoMADE – Romanian Mobile Apps Developers and Experts, an action financed by the Romanian Government and organized together with Romanian Creative Industries Business Federation. They were in San Jose to explore the business opportunities in Silicon Valley.
We then met for drinks again, at El Rio, and afterwards we headed out to the traditional El Farolito. Good turnout, fun night.
Later that month, a few of us connected with Cristian, one of the Meetin VR founders, who was visiting the Bay Area looking to network and potentially raise capital.
This month was all about meetups again, with South Bay members getting their second event, with Adrian and Ionut hosting again in the San Pedro Square Market, Downtown San Jose. There was no SF meetup this month, but we promoted more Romanians doing cool things in tech and also kicked off Presidential elections voter registrations.
I had been organizing meetups by myself for a few months now. It was time for a change.
The month kicked off with great news, Andrei joined me as co-host and organizer for the Romanian IT community in San Francisco. It was a few months after Mihai had left town and I had been looking for people to help out with event hosting, moderation and other responsibilities.
In August we organized a hike to Rodeo Beach (4.8mi) and the monthly El Rio meetup, which we had to move to the next-door bar, due to a wedding taking place at El Rio! Still great fun and good turnout.
This was the month where we decided we needed a WhatsApp group, so we can include people who went off Facebook. The group link is on the Facebook page, had to remove it from the blog due to spammers coming in. We also started promoting events for a very busy September.
This month, besides elections updates and voter registration, we met and hiked not once, but twice each – Angel Island early in the month (6mi), then Coastal and Fox Trails Loop (6.3mi), plus 2x El Rio meetups.
I think by this time we found that everyone’s sweet spot with hiking is around 6 miles. I tried not to go over that so we don’t exhaust everyone after a full day on the trails. Love the feedback!
We also promoted Alianta‘s event in Washington DC, that was organized in October, the 7th edition of the Romanian Film Festival at Stanford University, UC Berkeley and San Francisco State University, also in October and more voter registration for the November elections.
Towards the end of the month we met with with Tudor, founder of Floating Dots and Studhub, who was visiting the US to look for new partnerships, and grow their development outsourcing business based in Cluj-Napoca.
We took a bit of a break in October, with only one meetup at the end of the month, after the 4 events in September. It was great to see everyone again at El Rio.
We continued to help with the elections volunteer recruitment and posting regular updates for the community, as well as promoting the film festival.
We also met with Bogdan and Alex, the founders of Plant an App – a low code development platform for custom business applications. They’re spending some time in the Bay Area, as their company is part of the 500 Startups program (early-stage venture fund and seed accelerator).
November was again very busy, with 4 events, 3 meetups and 1 hack day. 2 of the meetups were all about the Presidential elections, that take place in 2 rounds in Romania, usually.
We met twice in South Bay, where for the first time since I had arrived in the Bay Area, we had another polling station. Both were fun, thanks everyone for coming out to vote and chat afterwards!
This time elections lasted for 3 days outside of Romania and almost 1 million Romanians in the diaspora came out to vote.
In November, Code for Romania hosted their second Hack Day in San Francisco, which I managed to miss, again, due to business travels.
We hosted a last meetup in mid-December, wishing everyone happy holidays and promising to see each other in the new year
(It poured, so we had a smaller turnout, and Adelina was our host, since El Rio was taken over by some office party with increasingly drunk people).
This month, we also promoted a Romanian night in the South Bay, and a few more movies in Berkeley. Unfortunately, due to rain and cold weather, I had to cancel the last hike of the year, much to the disappointment of a few of us.
Overall, we had a great year, with 19 events, two elections and the bar is high for 2020. Looking forward to more meetups, hikes and more people getting involved in the community. If you know someone who’s looking for likeminded Romanians to hang out with, Romanian IT in San Francisco is a welcoming group, granted we share the same values.
My commitment for next year is that we’ll do at least 1 event in January 2020, #promise! Happy new year!
When I was working actively in the blockchain space, one of the
biggest debates for the “non-believers” was around immutability and why it
matters, especially in the notorious double-spend problem. If you don’t recognize
the problem, it’s hard to see a solution or an advantage.
Chargebacks: If chargebacks are not a problem, “immutability
is not an advantage of blockchain, it is simply a feature of blockchain. But it
is not solving anything, so why put it up as an advantage?”
Government tax numbers: “For instance, I can say that I have
a product which makes sure that the government does not arbitrarily change your
tax number. Okay. But is there a big problem of governments changing people’s
tax numbers? Not in the slightest! So why mention it as an advantage? It is
solving a non-existing problem.”
These challenges seem to be very different. But they are not.
Both the chargeback problem and the government tax problem described above are
about identity. Let me explain how. Chargebacks are about who took my money for
the wrong reasons and how I get it back, within a network. The government tax
number is about how the government identifies its tax payers so you can be sure
that it recognizes you have paid your dues. Both trust the central “ oracle”, the
governor of the network or the country administrators/tax collectors. Both are
vulnerable to Sybil attacks and can only work with other networks/countries if
there is trust and transparency across networks.
Let’s take a step back and talk about identity. There are
three forms of identity as of today:
Non-digital identity – think of your
birth certificate, your driver’s license, your old passport and other paper/plastic/metal
Digital identity – your SSO service,
your user management platform, Facebook account, your biometric data on a new
passport, your email address, credit cards
Decentralized identity – similar to
the digital identity category, but issued and/or stored outside a centralized
database, on individual devices/mediums that the owner controls
While the first two are easier to grasp, the third one is
still nascent, with a few use cases emerging now in access management,
cryptocurrency wallets, for example. You’d be tempted to say that immutability
is only key for the decentralized identity category. And you would be wrong.
Our world goes through great lengths to make sure that your non-digital and
digital identity is unique and immutable, so that you can’t be one person today
and another person the next day. This immutability and the identity consistency
that it creates is the foundation of our society. You can create long term
relationships only if the other person is who they say they are over time and
that statement does not fundamentally change.
This immutability attribute is what makes identity possible,
not just decentralized identity, all identity. The difference is that you’re
not relying on a 3rd party to keep records of who is who, like in
the centralized examples. With decentralized identity, you are relying on
immutable records of a person’s (or a bot’s, if you like) collection of credentials
and their minimum viable verification proof (MVVP). There’s a lot of materials
to read on the topic, especially from the W3C, a standardization body that
makes the internet interoperable.
Since I brought up interoperability, immutability is a
direct enabler of that as it becomes exponentially easier to operate across networks
if you don’t have always verify all the actors all over again from scratch. The
costs and time to verify drop significantly.
If you’re a blockchain non-believer, or nay-sayer, try thinking about a time you had to redo something all over again, like prove who you are, because there was no easy way to cross networks reliably. It might not be an obvious problem today, but in the future it will speed up and increase the security of travel, payments, building access, virtually any kind of transaction that occurs between two or more parties that need to be identified.
It’s almost the end of 2019, and there are still a lot of
marketers out there that are too afraid to pour some personality into their
strategies. You know the ones I’m talking about, the ones who created and made “corporate
speak” a category.
It’s those who tweet or post on LinkedIn using language that
the board or some lawyers reviewed first, so it ends up sounding like all
things to all people, or like nothing at all, failing to commit to a storyline.
Sure, it de-risks the post and the company, but it also reduces
the possibility of a standout, and in turn, long term success for the brand. That
might make sense for a quarter to quarter focused team, but for those who want
to play the 5-10-15 year game, it’s quite damaging.
Brands are a lot like people. They can be interesting or
boring, on a sliding scale, with 00s of shades of grey. You know an interesting
person when you see them – they stand out using a few simple traits – loud voice,
strong facial expressions, specific clothes, specific/expert/passion topics
they speak about, clear attitudes, strong beliefs. All those flavors define
them and help them show their inner uniqueness. The boring one will be the
polar opposite – low voice, no facial expression, traditional, conservative
clothing, talks about the weather, their commute or some other mundane topic
that’s low risk, equivocal attitudes, weak or no beliefs they hold/show.
Obviously, no one is 100% interesting or 100% boring.
Sometimes we are both at the same time, depending on the audience. For example,
when I speak about cryptocurrencies, artificial intelligence or quantum computing
around my wife, she tunes out, and tells me outright that I’m boring her and I
should change the topic. When I do it with my Romanian IT group, people listen
and engage with me on those topics, and soon 2 hours pass without changing the
Interesting people, like interesting brands, are deeply interesting
to their target audience and uninteresting to the rest. It keeps the
conversation clean – only the ones who care should engage with you and your
brand. The rest are time wasters, better have them focus their time and energy
There’s tons of literature out there about how to best do this
as a marketer, so I won’t get into that. The problem is not reading it, but
putting it into practice, especially in an organization that is inherently risk
averse and there are non-marketing gatekeepers on how the brand should
As marketers, we need to let go of our fear of being too out
there, too forward or too bold. That fear is what keeps us from being
interesting, same as in our personal lives. Sure, there will be people who don’t
like the message. Sure, you will make mistakes along the way, and some may
argue that this is a sure way to get fired. Not letting go of the fear is the
best way to get fired, and not just from the company, but from the entire industry
Boring marketers have a special place in the world, and that’s not on any top or podium, but in the “looking for a career change category”.
I heard the original line while driving to Los Altos, for the Romanian presidential elections, round one. My wife said it out loud in the car while we were discussing attitudes towards failing and where we had all grown up, back in Eastern Europe, and connected to a message on one of the leading party’s WhatsApp group about a candidate that received over 1.7M votes.
I thought then and there that I wanted to write about the topic, about our shared trauma, as a generation that grew up in fear of this dreaded failure. There’s more to it than that, but not for today.
Today, I was also prompted by something else. Another friend of mine wrote a beautiful post (in Romanian) about admiration and how rare of a muscle this was, and to some extent, still is where we come from.
While I was growing up, I didn’t understand until later that you had to hide any kind of weakness or hint of deviation from the norm. Others did, and the way they did it was directly linked to the ones that didn’t – like me. They learned to see a blush, a tremor in ones voice, a showing of emotion and to turn that against the “perpetrator”, thereby deflecting any attention on their own failures. It’s like they “felt” when someone around them could be perceived as failing and took the opportunity to point the first finger, and so positioning themselves in a safe space, as the accuser, not the accused.
Memories of public micro-moments where I failed, trying to ask girls out, speaking up against bullies, speaking out on topics I enjoyed, playing basketball, and later in work environments, both in companies and as an entrepreneur or consultant, they all share the same thing – one person or, usually, a group of people constantly looking for ways to tell you how you’re failing or you are going to fail.
It’s an incredibly toxic culture that pushes people to close up, create a large wall, a persona to hide behind and only come out when things are “perfect”, or not come out at all because they do not fell “worthy” or “enough” to face the scrutiny of the finger-pointers. This breeds insecurities and the imposter syndrome. This also breeds fake people, that are risk averse to anything that might tear down the wall or pierce the vail.
If I look inside and am very honest with myself, it was less about economic opportunity when I left Romania, it was more about escaping this cultural context where failure was ridiculed and constantly tracked. It still is, and probably will be until enough people speak up and tell those people off.
It’s ok to fail, it’s ok to try and not always win, it’s ok to show that you’re human.
I admire people who start something knowing that it’s highly likely they will fail.
I used to write a lot at some point and even guest post on other sites. Recently, I started writing again, and with the intro of a friend, I was invited to contribute to HavingTime.com, a platform for people with stories to tell.
I chose to share my thoughts about my own impostor syndrome, and how I managed to overcome it. I found it very ironic that it was the very first thought that struck me while I was searching for a first topic to send them for review. It was basically telling me I have no authority and that my story is not interesting enough to be shared there.
It was an opportunity too good to refuse, that’s what I said about two years ago, when I left AI for the crypto world and joined Civic Technologies to help build what now is a decentralized marketplace (identity.com) and the for-profit startup on top of it (civic.com), that eventually expanded from identity to identity and finch – decentralized finance / defi. It was a great journey, with an amazing team and I’m sure they will do well moving forward.
Now for the personal news. This October, I have joined the Figure Eight team, part of Appen, as the Director of Marketing Communications. The group is the biggest ML-assisted and crowd data labeling platform for machine learning. I can’t share too much about the journey ahead, but I can tell you big things will happen in this industry in the next 5-10 years. Machine learning is at a point where it has become productive in a few industries and more and more giants are now looking at their data sets, their processes and trying to figure out how to optimize and improve efficiency.
Data is the new energy, and it’s likely we will see a similar revolution with ML departments as we have seen with the IT function. It (and IT, ha!) started out in the basement, with the servers, and evolved from a fringe function to the core of many of the most profitable businesses in the world. The best jobs out there rely on IT today and will do so in the future. I see the same future for machine learning, now elevated from curiosity/research only domain to part of the engineering team, where it plays various roles, from marginal to core business, depending on the company. Soon, with enough data and understanding of ML processes and principles, any enterprise will be able to scale faster and more effectively.
You might wonder what data labeling has to do with all this.
“During the gold rush it’s a good time to be in the pick and shovel business,” Mark Twain reportedly said
Think of it like the gold rush, where people flock to gold bearing mountains to find the prize, gold. They need food, supplies, clothes, fuel, picks and shovels, mining gear and machines, cars and planes. It this case, the prize is profit, the gold rush is the digital age and data is the energy powering everything. The more energy you have and the more refined/adequate it is, the better your chances to find gold. Same goes for machine learning, the more high quality data you have, the less of it you need to train an efficient model, the less resources you spend on computing power. Also, data, unlike fuel, comes in all shapes and sizes, and there will always be more data to be labeled as it is being created.
Long story short, I’m excited about the journey ahead and looking forward to sharing more stories along the way.